>i received this post and sent a simple answer ( it leaves the viewer >free to see and experience unimpeded by a title) which is probably not the >correct reply. thought maybe someone could give me a better one.
it might have more to do with a plethora of stupid titles persistent in the visual arts. music seems unaffected mostly because usually there is some sort of established reference point. plus ir's much more difficult to get music released. it seems it is most bad with the "traditional" visual arts like painting and sculpture, which may point to the fact those forms are obsolete in some way. too many "amoeba apartheid heartbeats" (to borrow a title from a comic book satirizing bad art) running around. ~M.E.
