[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Owen, these are excuses. Can you name one worthwhile thing you have >learned from Eric Anderson's posts to FLUXLIST? Can you produce one even >minimally constructive post? His entire output on this list has been to 1. >maintain his assertion that no one in "real Fluxus" considers Ken Friedman >to be legitimate, and 2. that Fluxlist is a foolish enterprise, has nothing >to do with Fluxus, and that those of us who participate are fools. Why >would anyone even want to maintain membership on an email discussion list >when this is their sole agenda? Eric Anderson is not a really nice guy, >not on Fluxlist. Show me one "nice guy" post. Show me one post where he >has ever contributed anything interesting or useful or beyond himself to >this list, and I will stand corrected. I don't care if Eric was at >Weisbaden in 1962 or if he has been involved in his own strain of Fluxus >for 40 years. That does not excuse his behavior on this list and how he >has treated others. He should be ashamed of himself. Sincerely, Allen
Allen - I understand your point of view fully and I can't say that I disagree with you -I know that Eric has been hard on a number of people - yourself being one and Ken certainly being the other. So I do understand, but I just look at it another way. BUT the real point I wanted to make is not just about Eric, but about caution as we start to move from an open list to a more controlled one. . . . Owen
