Fluxlist is a foolish enterprise, has nothing > > to do with Fluxus, and that those of us who participate are fools.
That's right this is not fluxus - it is fluxnexus. Fluxus is a dead thing that ran its course. We are all fluxnexus artists.(when we want to be.) some are dadafluxnexusists, some are practfluxnexusists and some proctofluxnexusists, full-o-flux-nexusists, some prepostfluxnexusists, antistructurofluxnexusists etc, and so on. Birds of all sorts are gathered in these branching moments. but I really don't know why Eric is on this list - just to give everyone some lip I guess - has anyone asked him? cecil Freshdot.com Web Hosting Service Host 10 domains on one account for 12.95mo (USD) Freshdot Domain Name Registrations transfers $7.75 for .com, .net and .org - 8.75 for new .biz and .info http://web-hosting.freshdot.com/ Cecil Touchon: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: Bertrand Clavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 4:35 PM Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: make that THREE and FOUR > Dear Allen, > > > maintain his assertion that no one in "real Fluxus" considers Ken Friedman > > to be legitimate, > Well, if I remember rightly, Ken accused him to be a compulsive liar (not > exactly in these terms, of course, but that's what it meant) reminding the > joke Erik did to Maciunas in the sixities...However, the point I want to > make is not that Eric or Ken said that or that and showing who's the worst > between the twos, what I'd like to say in fact, is that this is an opinion, > no a unalterable truth, and that lots of others were having a different one > from Ken (including myself, as Eric knows). > BTW, it is today impossible to work with Ken and any other "historic"FLuxus > on a concert or anything, one part or the other resign instantaneously, > which, of course is a stupid and sad thing, but a reality too. > > and 2. that Fluxlist is a foolish enterprise, has nothing > > to do with Fluxus, and that those of us who participate are fools. Why > >would anyone even want to maintain membership on an email discussion list > > when this is their sole agenda? > But if it was really the case, can you tell me why, since all this years, > and with the amount of work that Eric has, why is he still on the list? > > > this list, and I will stand corrected. I don't care if Eric was at > > Weisbaden in 1962 > Actually, he was not, and you know that very well, don't you Allen? > Anyway, I find it sad, that a stupid logomaniac as Mr. Death led us to such > extremities. > > Bertrand > > > >
