Dear Allen, > maintain his assertion that no one in "real Fluxus" considers Ken Friedman > to be legitimate, Well, if I remember rightly, Ken accused him to be a compulsive liar (not exactly in these terms, of course, but that's what it meant) reminding the joke Erik did to Maciunas in the sixities...However, the point I want to make is not that Eric or Ken said that or that and showing who's the worst between the twos, what I'd like to say in fact, is that this is an opinion, no a unalterable truth, and that lots of others were having a different one from Ken (including myself, as Eric knows). BTW, it is today impossible to work with Ken and any other "historic"FLuxus on a concert or anything, one part or the other resign instantaneously, which, of course is a stupid and sad thing, but a reality too.
and 2. that Fluxlist is a foolish enterprise, has nothing > to do with Fluxus, and that those of us who participate are fools. Why >would anyone even want to maintain membership on an email discussion list > when this is their sole agenda? But if it was really the case, can you tell me why, since all this years, and with the amount of work that Eric has, why is he still on the list? > this list, and I will stand corrected. I don't care if Eric was at > Weisbaden in 1962 Actually, he was not, and you know that very well, don't you Allen? Anyway, I find it sad, that a stupid logomaniac as Mr. Death led us to such extremities. Bertrand
