Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> I think they screwed up the grammar.
Me too. However, I think it would be really hard to press
something which is "intuitive", consistent as well as easy to
parse into a single grammar for all XSLFO porperties. It seems
they fell for the same as the C preprocessor guys did, which
is intuitive and easy to implement for the most part, but had
this abominable 0xe-12 problem as well as the rather unintuitive
"argument prescanning" hidden in its dark corners.

> As I stated before, I find it ludicrous
> that character="-" would not be OK.
That's ok, but it would require some extensions to the whole
property handling.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to