On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Friday 15 November 2002 09:30, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> >. . .(does anyone even know what I am talking
> > about)
> Not much on my side as the whole layout thing is still a mystery to me 
> (because I have no experience in computing layouts and never took 
> the time to study this part the code in detail). Anyway I'll try to put my 2 
> cents in...
> >From your description, I get a feeling that a separate "BreaksManager" class 
> might be needed, i.e. it might be better making this break stuff modular 
> instead of making the layout managers more complex. 

Could be an option, get the common break handling/storing into a
separate class that does that work.

Complexity creep is a real problem in this area and that could make
things easier.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to