On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Friday 15 November 2002 09:30, Keiron Liddle wrote: > >. . .(does anyone even know what I am talking > > about) > > Not much on my side as the whole layout thing is still a mystery to me > (because I have no experience in computing layouts and never took > the time to study this part the code in detail). Anyway I'll try to put my 2 > cents in... > > >From your description, I get a feeling that a separate "BreaksManager" class > might be needed, i.e. it might be better making this break stuff modular > instead of making the layout managers more complex.
Could be an option, get the common break handling/storing into a separate class that does that work. Complexity creep is a real problem in this area and that could make things easier. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
