Jeremias (et al.),

I have implemented the changes as prescribed and tested it with several fo
files containing text and graphics. Everything looks good so far. I have two
open issues:

1) I have implemented the encryption through the command line interface and
renderOptions. Should it have been implemented to use the config.xml
instead? Both?

2) I am using Forte 4.0 CE and the built-in CVS engine. checkout was great.
However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When I select
diff, it gives me a visual comparison. I assume that CVS diff is like the
UN*X command line diff for use with patch... can anybody help.
Unfortunately, I am on a Windows platform as that is our development
platform at work.

Otherwise, I ready to submit this.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: Encryption

Hi Patrick

On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
> little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1
> encryption with support for user and owner passwords, print, copy, content
> edit and annotation edit control written against v0.20.4. Some more QC and
> commenting and it will be ready for submission. I have command line
> of options which are passed to the renderer via renderOptions. All
> encryption is support via bouncecastle's provider. Now a couple questions
> before I submit it.
> 1) Which version do the committers want this verified? 0.20.4 or 0.20.4rc?

Neither. We're already having 0.20.5rc and approaching 0.20.5. :-) You
should provide a unified CVS diff against the maintenance branch (CVS
tag "fop-0_20_2-maintain").

> 2) Where can I find some complicated fo files for transforming and

There's only the examples in the FOP distribution. But I think you'll
find other examples when searching the mailing list archives.

> 3) Is anybody interested in helping to test this?

I'm concentrating on the redesign. I'd rather help there.

> 4) I would like to implement the PDF 1.4 version V2 for the fop
> is anybody interested?

Yup. Everything that brings the redesign forward is welcome.

Jeremias Maerki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to