Jeremias (et al.), I have implemented the changes as prescribed and tested it with several fo files containing text and graphics. Everything looks good so far. I have two open issues:
1) I have implemented the encryption through the command line interface and renderOptions. Should it have been implemented to use the config.xml instead? Both? 2) I am using Forte 4.0 CE and the built-in CVS engine. checkout was great. However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When I select diff, it gives me a visual comparison. I assume that CVS diff is like the UN*X command line diff for use with patch... can anybody help. Unfortunately, I am on a Windows platform as that is our development platform at work. Otherwise, I ready to submit this. Pat -----Original Message----- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Encryption Hi Patrick On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote: > Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a > little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1 R2 > encryption with support for user and owner passwords, print, copy, content > edit and annotation edit control written against v0.20.4. Some more QC and > commenting and it will be ready for submission. I have command line control > of options which are passed to the renderer via renderOptions. All > encryption is support via bouncecastle's provider. Now a couple questions > before I submit it. > > 1) Which version do the committers want this verified? 0.20.4 or 0.20.4rc? Neither. We're already having 0.20.5rc and approaching 0.20.5. :-) You should provide a unified CVS diff against the maintenance branch (CVS tag "fop-0_20_2-maintain"). > 2) Where can I find some complicated fo files for transforming and testing? There's only the examples in the FOP distribution. But I think you'll find other examples when searching the mailing list archives. > 3) Is anybody interested in helping to test this? I'm concentrating on the redesign. I'd rather help there. > 4) I would like to implement the PDF 1.4 version V2 for the fop redesign... > is anybody interested? Yup. Everything that brings the redesign forward is welcome. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
