No user defined mappings. The semantics of such mappings have to be defined elsewhere anyway.

Extensions will have to be programmed in alongside the fo: elements and within the processing logic.


Glen Mazza wrote:
That simplifies things!--just out of curiosity, no
user-defined extension mappings either?  (Not that I
was clear how those would work with the current code

-- Peter B. West

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to