What's sorely missing IMHO is a way to validate the generated RTF other than by crashing word processors. If you hear about an RTF validator or an RTF parser grammar it would be a welcome improvement.
-Bertrand
I don't know if any of these'll help, but a quick search on Google came up with these... (among 127,000 others--I'm not much of an RTF buff, so I haven't ried any of these, but if you're interested, by all means check it out...):
http://search.cpan.org/author/PVERD/RTF-Parser-1.07/ http://testers.cpan.org/search?request=dist&dist=RTF-Parser http://membres.lycos.fr/econoweb/rtf/ http://informs.hud.ac.uk/cgi-bin/informs.pl?area=tools&page=2 ftp://ftp.primate.wisc.edu/pub/RTF/index.html http://www.ph.unimelb.edu.au/~ssk/kde/devel/dictidx.html http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/#rtf http://www.idealsoftware.com/
Here's a discussion of RTF::Parser: http://bumppo.net/lists/macperl-modules/2000/04/threads.html#00001
I hope someone finds this stuff useful. -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
