<snip /> > is being interrogated/perceived/discussed...
Sorry, it's late here... > You are IMO very correct by stating that 'if the Layout info can > be reused, > so can the AT and the renderer', however, if I interpret correctly, the > latter two are designed to dispose of their created objects ASAP. > The downstream objects hold a reference to the upstream ones, not > the other > way around --unless you have a way out of there, as long as a certain > page-sequence is referenced, the entire Layout/AT/Renderer structure would > exist in memory, which can get .. quite large even for moderately sized > documents. Would it really be worth a shot to change the design there, and > flip a switch? Throw the FOTree away and just fill up the AT and re-use > that? > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > > >
