<snip />
> is being interrogated/perceived/discussed...

Sorry, it's late here...

> You are IMO very correct by stating that 'if the Layout info can
> be reused,
> so can the AT and the renderer', however, if I interpret correctly, the
> latter two are designed to dispose of their created objects ASAP.
> The downstream objects hold a reference to the upstream ones, not
> the other
> way around --unless you have a way out of there, as long as a certain
> page-sequence is referenced, the entire Layout/AT/Renderer structure would
> exist in memory, which can get .. quite large even for moderately sized
> documents. Would it really be worth a shot to change the design there, and
> flip a switch? Throw the FOTree away and just fill up the AT and re-use
> that?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to