--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway, what's the point of having the constants > both in > the Constants interface and nested interfaces? I'm > confused. >
I originally wanted to retain it just to make the code better self-documenting. One can see the constants relevant for each property that one is coding with, and code with less concern of coding a constant outside the allowed set of constant values for the property. But now that I think more about it, the spec already takes care of the former concern, and as for the latter problem, whenever it occurs, it would just a bug to be identified and removed. It would not be the end of the world. So I now tend to agree with removing those nested interfaces in the Constants class. Any objections? > >>[buildfile] > > Well, now that the FOP website is generated by > Forrest, > the various html-* targets could be removed, > couldn't they? > Makes sense. Glen
