What Andreas argues here is what I would think as well: The LMs are
tied to the formatting objects, not to the page regions they populate.

Regards, Simon

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 07:10:40PM +0200, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > I see two LM classes that appear misnamed, which can
> > cause confusion as to their purpose:
> >
> > 1.) FlowLayoutManager is defined as "the layout
> > manager for an fo:flow object" -- but actually it can
> > also be for an fo:static-content object if the static
> > content is directed to the region-body of the page.
> 
> So, IIC you're considering the FlowLM or StaticContentLM as being unrelated
> to the fo:flow or fo:static-content objects --or at least: more related to
> the page-regions than to the formatting objects?
> 
> Agreed that, according to the XSL Spec. --WD or not--, it's allowed to
> redirect the fo:static-content (for example) to a different region than
> 'before' or 'after', but it could be argued that another option is to let
> the StaticContentLM take care of the redirection of the fo:static-content to
> the right region... I suppose the current StaticContentLM should already
> allow for redirection to either 'xsl-region-before' or 'xsl-region-after',
> so it should be quite straightforward to add 'xsl-region-body' as another
> alternative (?) After all, there is a key difference between Flow and
> StaticContent when considering markers: the first one can contain
> fo:markers, while the second one can only retrieve them...
> One aspect that *does* seem to become increasingly important is the
> inter-play of the StaticContentLM and the FlowLM --if both can layout to the
> same region(s).
> 
> IMO there is no solid argument against the *reason* itself for this
> renaming --on the contrary, it seems more than reasonable--, but regardless
> of its validity, I do have my doubts on the end-result of the proposed way
> to solve the related issues...
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andreas
> 

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl

Reply via email to