The problems reported here with e-g and padding / borders apply equally to i-f-o. It's not too hard to fix. While doing this I noticed that the code for the i-f-o LM and e-g LM is logically largely identical although some bits have been coded slightly differently.
Any concerns if I put a common LM for i-f-o, e-g that into the LM inheritance hierarchy (working name ForeignContent LM, i.e. content not native of XSL-FO)? So we have something like: i-f-o LM implements ForeignContent LM e-g LM implements ForeignContent LM and ForeignContent LM implements LeafNode LM. This would allow all the code related to the viewport generation, content scaling, and rectangle sizing for i-f-o and e-g to be in one place only. The i-f-o and e-g LMs would become very small basically only providing the image or foreignObject area to be placed into the viewport. Manuel On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 01:04 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Oh right. Again someone caught me shooting too fast from the hip. > Damn. I will probably never manage to get that right. :-( It's good > to have people around to pay attention. > > I wondered about the large-allocation-rectangle while reading through > 6.3.2 but obviously forgot to check the docs for e-g and i-f-o. > Sorry, Manuel, Vincent is right. > > On 01.09.2005 18:44:52 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > I'm not sure here. The fo:external-graphic uses the > > large-allocation-rectangle (§ 6.6.5), that comprises padding and > > border. This makes me say that in Manuel's example the fo:block's > > bpd should be calculated with the second formula. The fo:block's > > content forms a line whose line-stacking-strategy is max-height > > (default). Thus its allocation rectangle should comprise the > > image's border & padding (§ 4.5). And so does the block. > > > > I may be wrong, as this part of the spec is still somewhat unclear > > to me. WDYT? > > > > Vincent > > > > Jeremias Maerki a écrit : > > > Indeed, the normal allocation rectangle of an inline area is > > > different than the one of a block area. See 4.3.2. Geometric > > > Definitions in the 1.0 spec. > > > > > > Border and padding for an inline area seem to be outside the > > > allocation rectangle in before and after directions. Interesting. > > > > > > On 01.09.2005 17:29:50 Manuel Mall wrote: > > >>I have a follow-up question on this. If we have something as > > >> simple(?) as this: > > >> > > >><fo:block background-color="orange"> > > >> <fo:external-graphic > > >> src="../../resources/images/bgimg300dpi.jpg" > > >> border="solid 5pt" > > >> padding="5pt" > > >> background-color="white"/> > > >></fo:block> > > >> > > >>would you expect the whole image including padding and borders to > > >> be within the bounds of the enclosing block or only the actual > > >> image to be in the block and the padding and borders to "stick > > >> out" at the top and bottom. It seems xep takes the latter > > >> approach and I am very uncertain in this area. Or to put it > > >> differently is the BPD of the enclosing block > > >> bpd = image height + line-spacing > > >>or > > >> bpd = image-height + top_and_bottom_borders + > > >> top_and_bottom_padding + line-spacing > > >>? > > >> > > >>Manuel > > >><snip/> > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > Jeremias Maerki