On 21.06.2006 16:19:30 Peter B. West wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 12:01 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Thanks, Peter. I went looking for that reference but wasn't lucky. I
> > gave up after almost 30 minutes. Could you dig up that reference for us?
> > 
> > The only post I found was one by G. Ken Holman which was never answered:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2005AprJun/0028
> > 
> > On 21.06.2006 11:04:53 Peter B. West wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 12:07 +0200, Luca Furini wrote:
> > > > Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > On 19.06.2006 15:45:36 Luca Furini wrote:
> > > > > > It seems to me that the prescribed behaviour requires a keep 
> > > > > > constraint 
> > > > > > with force = "always" to be satisfied *always* :-), even if this 
> > > > > > would 
> > > > > > mean having some overflowing content. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obviously, we disagree here. I read it so that "always" can also be
> > > > > relaxed if the keep cannot be satisfied. Did anyone check what other
> > > > > implementations do?
> > > > 
> > > > A quick test shows that AntennaHouse's xslformatter satisfies all the 
> > > > keeps, even when this means having some content overflow the body 
> > > > region 
> > > > (the overflowing content is actually clipped), while RenderX's xep 
> > > > relaxes 
> > > > a keep constraint in order to avoid overflows.
> > > 
> > > >From memory, this issue was clarified in a posting to the editors list
> > > some time ago (2 years or more, I think.) "always" means "always", which
> > > makes sense.
> 
> I'll see if it's on the laptop at home. All I remember about it was that
> it was a reply from one of the editors.

Thanks a lot!

> Where were you looking?

Using friend Google, my mail client and
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=xsl-editors


Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to