On 21.06.2006 16:34:20 Peter B. West wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 21.06.2006 16:19:30 Peter B. West wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 12:01 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > Thanks, Peter. I went looking for that reference but wasn't lucky. I > > > > gave up after almost 30 minutes. Could you dig up that reference for us? > > > > > > > > The only post I found was one by G. Ken Holman which was never answered: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2005AprJun/0028 > > > > > > > > On 21.06.2006 11:04:53 Peter B. West wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 12:07 +0200, Luca Furini wrote: > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 19.06.2006 15:45:36 Luca Furini wrote: > > > > > > > > It seems to me that the prescribed behaviour requires a keep > > > > > > > > constraint > > > > > > > > with force = "always" to be satisfied *always* :-), even if > > > > > > > > this would > > > > > > > > mean having some overflowing content. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obviously, we disagree here. I read it so that "always" can also > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > relaxed if the keep cannot be satisfied. Did anyone check what > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > implementations do? > > > > > > > > > > > > A quick test shows that AntennaHouse's xslformatter satisfies all > > > > > > the > > > > > > keeps, even when this means having some content overflow the body > > > > > > region > > > > > > (the overflowing content is actually clipped), while RenderX's xep > > > > > > relaxes > > > > > > a keep constraint in order to avoid overflows. > > > > > > > > > > >From memory, this issue was clarified in a posting to the editors > > > > > >list > > > > > some time ago (2 years or more, I think.) "always" means "always", > > > > > which > > > > > makes sense. > > > > > > I'll see if it's on the laptop at home. All I remember about it was that > > > it was a reply from one of the editors. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > Where were you looking? > > > > Using friend Google, my mail client and > > http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=xsl-editors > > > > Have you tried the Disposition of Comments? I don't know how accessible > they are to Google.
They are accessible through the list archive at W3C. I've looked at those I found but I found no listing of all XSL-related ones. Jeremias Maerki
