Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 09:39, Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Am I the only one concerned about backwards-compatibility here?
It's not my *concern*, but deliberately breaking compatibility does
seem pretty silly.
Yeah, so one night I thought: "Let's see if we can annoy everyone who
has the bad habit of not using the readily provided base classes for
That explains it!
Peter B. West <http://cv.pbw.id.au/>