Hi Vincent,

> Should the rule be disabled because of that? Having proper javadoc on at
> least public methods is very important. OTOH, this is actually not
> something Checkstyle can verify. How many methods in the code base have
> totally useless comments that are there just to avoid a Checkstyle
> warning...
> 
> I think I’d prefer to keep the rule, but wouldn’t veto its removal.

I don't vote for removal too, I only vote for the right to violate it in
cases one can't add any useful information in the comment.


Best Regards
Alex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to