On Wed, October 27, 2010 8:11 pm, Patrick Jaromin wrote: ... > Before I embark on this process (or even discuss it in more depth) I > figured I'd see if anyone else has made any movements on this or has any > thoughts. My system uses my own namespace/attributes, however I would > likely adopt the specifications outlined in XSL:FO 2.0 working draft > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/#req_2_1_4).
The XSL FO 2.0 Requirements note [1] includes a section on copyfitting [2]. I expect, but can't promise, that the next, real-soon-now version of the XSL FO 2.0 Working Draft [3]. When copyfitting is in a published WD, it would be useful for the next version of XSL FO if you could review the WD in light of your experience and provide feedback using the W3C Bugsilla [4]. Regards, Tony Graham tony.gra...@menteithconsulting.com Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20-req/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20-req/#copyfitting [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/ [4] http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xsl-fo-bugzilla.html
