Hi Glenn,

The GSoC doesn't relate directly to the ASF or FOP directly, however,
putting a few FOP projects as proposals would be a good way to get
some new interest into the project. I think it would be good for us as
we benefit from any work done, and it helps whomever does the work
learn the various skills that we as a community can impart upon them.

I've included a link to the GSoC below, but if you do some research,
there's plenty of information out there.



On 1 March 2012 16:13, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> could you provide a link to the "Google Summer of Code Project"? how does it
> relate to ASF and FOP activities?
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:50 AM, mehdi houshmand <med1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We're thinking of submitting a proposal or two to the Google Summer of
>> Code project and wanted to get some input from the community on ideas.
>> Once we've got a few proposals I'll create a wiki page and put all the
>> ideas on there, but for now I just wanted to gauge interest.
>> In terms of mentoring, I'm happy to be a mentor and I've registered as
>> one and if any other committers fancy the job, do register, the more
>> the merrier. The deadline is 9th March, so that doesn't give us long
>> to bounce around ideas, but here are a few I was thinking:
>> - There have been recent discussions between Jeremias, myself and
>> others about extracting the Fonts packages into their own library. I
>> think this would be a great idea for a project because essentially it
>> only involves a few, well defined specifications (TTF, Type1 etc) and
>> doesn't expose the person to too much complexity. The way I'd suggest
>> this to be done, is by re-writing rather than porting, that way it
>> gives the person much more flexibility and also the current code would
>> give them good tips and tricks on how to deal with parsing fonts.
>> - TTF in AFP. I know we still have the TrueTypeInPostScript branch
>> flying around, and however much I'd like to fob that onto someone
>> else, I don't think it's fair to do so. I have no idea how long this
>> project would take, but I think FOP could really benefit from it.
>> Currently we're forcing users to use AFP fonts for AFP documents, a
>> lot of which are archaic and use EBCDIC, for those of you who haven't
>> been exposed to EBCDIC, count yourself lucky.
>> There may be something to do with PCL?? I'm not at all familiar with
>> the format, but I do remember discussions about upgrading to a newer
>> PCL standard? I'd be happy to acquaint myself with the format if
>> there's interest in the idea.
>> Hopefully we can get a proposal together in time.
>> Mehdi

Reply via email to