Great job Vincent! You might also want to update the docs under  to reflect the new TrueType/OpenType support, see, e.g., the Limitations section.
 src/documentation/contentxdocs/trunk/output.html#ps On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>wrote: > While I was merging the FOP branch I suddenly remembered that there were > changes also to XGC. > > Strictly speaking I should have launched a vote on general@ to approve > the merge of the XGC part. But since I was already in the middle of the > merge process and that process is fairly complicated (involving many > manipulations behind the scenes to keep our private branches in sync), > I didn’t want to stop, launch the vote, and restart later, and loose > track of what I was doing where and why. > > Since the FOP branch depends on the XGC changes anyway, one could assume > that approving the merge of the FOP branch implicitly meant to approve > that of the XGC branch. > > Please shout if you believe this is twisting the Apache policy too much, > and we’ll see what we can do. > > Vincent > > > On 22/06/12 11:50, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > We have 7 +1, the vote passes. > > > > I’ll proceed with the merge within the next few days. > > > > Thanks, > > Vincent > > > > > > On 15/06/12 11:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >> As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the > >> Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some > >> clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). > >> > >> We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and > >> it has proven to work reasonably well. I won’t hide the fact that some > >> parts of the code are truly ugly (in PSFontUtils mainly), but it’s not > >> possible to clean that up without heavily refactoring the font > >> sub-system, which I unfortunately can’t spend time on right now. At > >> least the ugliness is fairly self-contained. Meanwhile some users may > >> find the additional functionality useful. > >> > >> So I’d like to propose a vote for merging that branch back to Trunk. The > >> vote will run until Thursday 21st, 8:00GMT. > >> > >> Here’s my +1. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Vincent >