On 10 Jun 2011, at 18:40, Rob Sargent wrote: Hi Rob
> <snip /> > Consider this thread closed, though I find the news that fo:table-row calls > don't generate area both enlightening and confusing. It is literally defined so in the Recommendation: see "Areas" at http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_table-row. I can see what you mean. It does make perfect sense, but from FOP perspective, also poses the challenge of properly implementing "id" on fo:table-row... Since there is no area to attach the id to, we currently have no location in the area tree that ref-ids can point to. Regards Andreas --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
