Hello Andreas,
Thanks for the clarification and spec. reference.
On 06/10/2011 10:49 AM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
On 10 Jun 2011, at 18:40, Rob Sargent wrote:
Hi Rob
<snip />
Consider this thread closed, though I find the news that fo:table-row calls
don't generate area both enlightening and confusing.
It is literally defined so in the Recommendation: see "Areas" at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_table-row.
I can see what you mean.
It does make perfect sense, but from FOP perspective, also poses the challenge of
properly implementing "id" on fo:table-row... Since there is no area to attach
the id to, we currently have no location in the area tree that ref-ids can point to.
Regards
Andreas
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
