On 06/10/2011 12:49 PM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > It does make perfect sense, but from FOP perspective, also poses the > challenge of properly implementing "id" on fo:table-row... Since > there is no area to attach the id to, we currently have no location > in the area tree that ref-ids can point to.
I hadn’t really thought about that. But IMO, the ID ought to attach to the first cell within the row. More generically, if any FO element has an ID but no area, the ID ought to attach to the first area generated by any of its descendants. That raises the possibility of a single area having multiple IDs... is that a problem in PDF? ~Chris -- Chris Maden, text nerd <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ > “Before I built a wall I’d ask to know / What I was walling in or out, / And to whom I was like to give offence.” — RF, Mending Wall GnuPG Fingerprint: C6E4 E2A9 C9F8 71AC 9724 CAA3 19F8 6677 0077 C319 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
