Just tried, same result.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<fop version="1.0">
  <use-cache>false</use-cache>
  <base>.</base>
  <fonts>
    <referenced-fonts>
      <match font-family=".*"/>
    </referenced-fonts>
  </fonts>
  <renderers>
    <renderer mime="application/pdf">
      <filterList>
        <value>flate</value>
      </filterList>
      <fonts>
        <directory>./fonts</directory>
      </fonts>
    </renderer>
  </renderers>
</fop>

~/Downloads/fop-1.0/test$ ls fonts/
SimSun.ttf

~/Downloads/fop-1.0/test$ ../fop -fo test-fo.xml -c configuration-referenced-with-directory-element.xml output-referenced-with-directory-element.pdf
Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
WARNING: Glyph "δ»…" (0x4ec5) not available in font "SimSun".
Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
WARNING: Glyph "δΎ›" (0x4f9b) not available in font "SimSun".
Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
WARNING: Glyph "参" (0x53c2) not available in font "SimSun".
Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
WARNING: Glyph "考" (0x8003) not available in font "SimSun".

Regards,
JP

Attachment: configuration-referenced-with-directory-element.xml
Description: XML document

Attachment: output-referenced-with-directory-element.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: test-fo.xml
Description: XML document


On 24 Apr 2012, at 17:09, Glenn Adams wrote:

btw, have you tried using the <directory/> element without the <auto-detect/> element? e.g.

<fonts>
  <directory>./fonts-to-reference-without-embedding</directory>
</fonts>

this allows you to restrict the set of fonts to be accessed for reference only (non-embedded) use

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
I notice at [1] that editable embedding is allowed. Note that FOP does not embed the entire font, but only those glyphs used in the document. I would be surprised if you were subject to redistribution licensing costs given this situation.

[1] http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FMID=1802


On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jean-Philippe Courson <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Glenn,

I don't want to embed the fonts to avoid significant font redistribution licensing costs.

The produced PDFs will be distributed to people having the fonts installed on their machine. 

Thanks for your help


Reply via email to