two more suggestions: (1) remove the first <fonts> element (containing the referenced fonts element) (2) use a current FOP 1.1dev (trunk) build [1]
[1] http://ci.apache.org/projects/xmlgraphics/fop/snapshots/ On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jean-Philippe Courson < [email protected]> wrote: > Just tried, same result. > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <fop version="1.0"> > <use-cache>false</use-cache> > <base>.</base> > > <fonts> > <referenced-fonts> > <match font-family=".*"/> > </referenced-fonts> > </fonts> > <renderers> > <renderer mime="application/pdf"> > <filterList> > <value>flate</value> > </filterList> > <fonts> > <directory>./fonts</directory> > </fonts> > </renderer> > </renderers> > </fop> > > ~/Downloads/fop-1.0/test$ ls fonts/ > SimSun.ttf > > ~/Downloads/fop-1.0/test$ ../fop -fo test-fo.xml -c > configuration-referenced-with-directory-element.xml > output-referenced-with-directory-element.pdf > Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener > processEvent > > WARNING: Glyph "δ» " (0x4ec5) not available in font "SimSun". > Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener > processEvent > > WARNING: Glyph "δΎ" (0x4f9b) not available in font "SimSun". > Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener > processEvent > > WARNING: Glyph "ε" (0x53c2) not available in font "SimSun". > Apr 24, 2012 5:27:33 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener > processEvent > > WARNING: Glyph "θ" (0x8003) not available in font "SimSun". > > Regards, > JP > > > > > > On 24 Apr 2012, at 17:09, Glenn Adams wrote: > > btw, have you tried using the <directory/> element without the > <auto-detect/> element? e.g. > > <fonts> > <directory>./fonts-to-reference-without-embedding</directory> > </fonts> > > this allows you to restrict the set of fonts to be accessed for reference > only (non-embedded) use > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I notice at [1] that editable embedding is allowed. Note that FOP does >> not embed the entire font, but only those glyphs used in the document. I >> would be surprised if you were subject to redistribution licensing costs >> given this situation. >> >> [1] http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FMID=1802 >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jean-Philippe Courson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Glenn, >>> >>> I don't want to embed the fonts to avoid significant font redistribution >>> licensing costs. >>> >>> The produced PDFs will be distributed to people having the fonts >>> installed on their machine. >>> >>> Thanks for your help >>> >> > > >
