On 29/11/17 10:45, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Oh no, *everyone* is talking features. :-) This has really nothing to > do with features, because that can easily fall into "neverending" > category of what's big enough change or not.
Well, *technically* we use SemVer (I know, I know...). For that, while features play a part, for me it's more about correctly calling out breaking changes. So if we're every going to deprecate a bunch of stuff, then we should call *that* 2.0. Otherwise it's just grandstanding ;) *Technically* we should be including the internal plugin API in our SemVer and bumping the major version every time plugins need to update... but that might get silly :P Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
