On 29/11/17 12:17, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > So I'd disagree we use SemVer.
I didn't mean we use it *properly*, just that anytime I see X.Y.Z as a versioning structure, my mind immediately thinks SemVer. That we *do* use it in other places only adds to the confusion. What I am thinking is that we *should* use SemVer, and not get so hesitant to bump the X component in the future. We have stuff we've wanted to deprecate for a while now, so let's use a tool for that which we already use in other places. It might also allow us to be more formal about those plugin contracts... Bikeshedding about SemVer aside, I'm good with doing a 2.0 release in the near future, but *please* lets use it to deprecate / drop stuff we no longer want to maintain. Otherwise there's no real point to it. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
