On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Og Maciel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Michael K. Johnson <johns...@rpath.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:06:18PM +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > >> I would say, if we think 2-qa is somewhat stable and better than > >> current fl:2, promote it to fl:2, create new images for that and start > >> rolling again. > > Yes, perfect is the enemy of good enough. > Agreed!
is packagekit the last remaining issue? can we remove packagekit from stable until it is fixed? (i think it is better to not have a tool, than to have a broken one. missing a gui will lead to "oh, it's not really for newbies" comments, while a broken packagekit will leat to: "it's bad, it crashes" comments, while also missleading users into thinking an easy gui is available. greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix searching contract jobs: programming, training and administration - anywhere -- pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org foresight developer (open-steam|caudium).org foresightlinux.org unix sysadmin iaeste.at realss.com Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
