On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Martin Baehr <
mba...@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Og Maciel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Michael K. Johnson <johns...@rpath.com>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:06:18PM +0200, Mark Trompell wrote:
> > >> I would say, if we think 2-qa is somewhat stable and better than
> > >> current fl:2, promote it to fl:2, create new images for that and start
> > >> rolling again.
> > > Yes, perfect is the enemy of good enough.
> > Agreed!
>
> is packagekit the last remaining issue?
>
>
I imagine that it is.
> can we remove packagekit from stable until it is fixed?
Yes, I think it should be removed. For now.
Since this has come up in the thread, I want to apologize for not making the
improvements that I promised that I could make on PK. There are a number of
excuses I could give -- I was busy with {paid work, family, sleeping} -- but
the simple point is that it didn't get done.
I move that we remove PK from the distro for now until further notice,
release 2-qa (if we're happy with it -- I haven't updated lately, and after
my ZOMG MY MAC DIED moment earlier this month, I lost my one VM of Foresight
I kept at home because I don't as a rule back up VM images due to space
constraints).
I think we should spend time working on PK, and I know that emBee has
expressed interest on working on it. emBee, if you are still amenable, I
think we should get a branch of PK on github based on latest trunk and spend
some time comparing notes. zodman, you're welcome to join also.
--sgp
_______________________________________________
Foresight-devel mailing list
Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org
http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
