This message is from the T13 list server.
WHOA! Apply this to setfeatures on write-cache! Just because it is "supported" does not mean it has to be "enabled". There are many other cases where "support" v/s "enable" may clash. I may be off base but not out of the loop. Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This message is from the T13 list server. > > > > >The only question (for me) is whether to CHANGE the wording for words > >100-103 > >from: "is mandatory if the 48-bit Address feature set is supported." > >to: "is mandatory if the 48-bit Address feature set is enabled." > > >>Supported I understand. What do you mean by "enabled"? Isn't > >>this one of those features that is always enabled if it is > >>supported just like 28-bit LBA is always enabled if supported? > > Ahhhh !!! > I never saw that fine point that some of the 'enabled' bits say > 'supported' !!! > Yes. If the feature is 'supported' it shall also report 'enabled' > > Thanx !!! > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Jim Hatfield > ATA Interface Firmware > Seagate Technology - PSG > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80501 USA > voice: 720-684-2120 > fax : 720-684-2711 > ==================================================== >
