This message is from the T13 list server.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This message is from the T13 list server. > > > > There is no 'serial atapi' proposal. I merely recorded the fact that > questions about > ATAPI via the Serial ATA interface are starting to surface more frequently > on the > reflector and elsewhere. > > T13 has a copyright release from the SATA working group, but is not 'free' > to change > technical content, but is allowed to consider clarifications. Regardless that my membership is invalid, when did the cigars and brandy start up in the back room? If T13 is nothing but a puppet front for the SGW, then T13 has violated its charter and terms. If there is a motion to change how SATA "shall" and I do mean "SHALL", and it is approved in a roll call vote then SWG has to live with it. This is stinks of backroom politics, and clearing the air is needed now. Gene must be doing freaking cartwheels and double back flips, right now. Where is Monica Vago when she is needed most to clean house. > The T13 liason to the SATA working group (Dan Colgrove) does ask the SATA > working > group for approval on some items, and the T13 members who are also SATA > working group > members have feedback in both groups. > > Thank You !!! I think you meant to replace the first and last "!" with periods. Maybe switching to all caps would simulate a memorex commerial. Can you reply with at least 4 or more "!", or can you see this is flame bait because the reflector should not represent how meetings operate? Cheers, Andre "The McCoy" Hedrick kk
