> mike,
> reset origin for everything except pik and place
> even if you don't for pp they can usually deal with it
>
> i hate when fab shops call too, it makes us look bad, consumes time and
> opens the door to yet more problems
>
> what do you mean exactly when you say 'drill chart' ?
> .drr ? or  drill symbols on a drill 'drawing'
>
> the drill symbols (table of special strings) in the drill dwg are
> definitely screwed in SP6 (new to SP6), but IMHO that doesn't matter
> because i think a drill drawing these days is extra baggage anyway, we
> don't do them anymore, just makes more work
>
> i was not aware that that problem would omit something, but considering
> they are wrong anyway (compared to the .drr) this is no big surprise
>

Dennis,
I agree, I have not seen this problem until the release of SP6 and started
checking the box for relative origin, at which point I changed my process
for generating gerbers.     I guess what I meant to say was      The number
of holes ....hole  count has been inaccurate in the drill legend  (.LEGEND,
special string,  on the gerber drill drawing)  vs the drill data generated
in the txt and acsii files.  These discrepancies only show when the
"relative" origins  are set in  both the workspace and cam output setup.
I have had no discrepancies when  resetting origins of the design  and then
checking the absolute origin for the gerbers.  It was always worked flawless
using the latter method, unless someone has observed otherwise.

I hope this clarifies what I am trying to say......good to hear from you
again

Mike Reagan
EDSI
Fredrick , MD

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to