I could register 100 different domain names and never bother to use any of it. No one else would able to use those either.
I prefer .com.np to become commercial (with the cost part) and may be the others remain free. If its business we have in .com.np domains, let them run their business at a very minimum cost, probably 500rs/year. That way the domain name will also have value. Also we haven't had something.np domain names which a lot of other countries have started already. Its strange why we don't have those here. On Jun 27, 5:36 pm, "Ujwal Shrestha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > current problem with .np domain is.. > if someone has hisname.com.np then you having hisname can't create another > account as namehis.com.np or any other.. > I was amazed when that didi (at mercantile domain registration table) told > me that it's impossible for me to get a domain with those reasons.. then I > turned around back to home telling them it's ridiculous thing for > mercantile with such reasons and their chest as the only .np > domain provider. > > regards > Ujwal > > On 6/27/08, Jitendra kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with Bibek, Geshan and Suraj that the domain names should be made > > available for use by others if it is not being used. > > Though, as pointed out by Hempal Dai, registration every year is not a good > > option. > > I think it should not be difficult for MOS to judge if the site is being > > used or not (can enforce some criteria for this one). And make a decision > > based on that. If it is unused for a year or so, make it available for use > > by others who want to apply for the domain. > > > And even if any registration is enforced, it should definitely be free :). > > > Cheers > > -Jitendra > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:44 PM, suraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Geshan Manandhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > > >>> I support the annual renewal scheme but why the cost. Its free let it be > >>> free. > > >> Geshan, I agree with you. It is and should be continued as free service. > >> Renewing yearly is obviously better solution. > > >>> Warm Regards, > >>> Geshan Manandhar > >>>http://geshan.com.np > >>>www.HAMROLYRICS.COM > > >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM, bibstha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > > >>>> Shouldn't .np be made commercial? atleast the .com.np part. > > >>>> The problem with current .np registration is, once someone registers > >>>> it, its gone for ever whether that someone uses it or not. > > >>>> If MOS doesnot want to commercialize .np domains, it could atleast > >>>> introduce a yearly renewal scheme so that old abandoned domains can be > >>>> reused. > > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Suraj Sapkota > >> सुरज सापकोटा > >> ----- > >> This space intentionally has nothing but text explaining why this > >> space has nothing but text explaining that this space would otherwise > >> have been left blank, and would otherwise have been left blank. > >> -Kernel.org > >> ----- > > -- > Regards > Ujwal Shrestha --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
