=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ramon_Rib=F3?= <[email protected]> wrote: > > that -M filename is also a useful choice. Regarding the bloat factor: the > > diff for -M is only a few lines of real code. i've pasted it below, but > > In my opinion, the decision should not be based on the added > complexity to the code (we programmers can deal with complexity, can't > we?), but with the added complexity for the final user. One more > option to read in the help, one more option to remember... >
and a whole lot of functionality. To me we shouldn't decide based on code complexity nor the number of options available but the necessity. -M is necessary for many tools to integrate with fossil and we do want more tools to integrate because it means more users. More users = better testing. Better testing = less problems for you and I. Another side effect is a larger number of users = a few more devs from that user bank, which starts the cycle all over again. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
