> ... because it means more users. More users = better > testing. Better testing = less problems for you and I.
Sure? And the pleasure of using an elite tool, far away from the masses? ---- Compass Ing. y Sistemas Dr. Ramon Ribo http://www.compassis.com [email protected] c/ Tuset, 8 7-2 tel. +34 93 218 19 89 08006 Barcelona, Spain fax. +34 93 396 97 46 2009/12/10 Jeremy Cowgar <[email protected]>: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ramon_Rib=F3?= <[email protected]> wrote: >> > that -M filename is also a useful choice. Regarding the bloat factor: the >> > diff for -M is only a few lines of real code. i've pasted it below, but >> >> In my opinion, the decision should not be based on the added >> complexity to the code (we programmers can deal with complexity, can't >> we?), but with the added complexity for the final user. One more >> option to read in the help, one more option to remember... >> > > and a whole lot of functionality. To me we shouldn't decide based on code > complexity nor the number of options available but the necessity. -M is > necessary for many tools to integrate with fossil and we do want more tools > to integrate because it means more users. More users = better testing. Better > testing = less problems for you and I. Another side effect is a larger number > of users = a few more devs from that user bank, which starts the cycle all > over again. > > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > tools to integrate because it means more users. More users = better testing. Better testing = less problems for you and I. Another side effect ---- Compass Ing. y Sistemas Dr. Ramon Ribo http://www.compassis.com [email protected] c/ Tuset, 8 7-2 tel. +34 93 218 19 89 08006 Barcelona, Spain fax. +34 93 396 97 46 2009/12/10 Jeremy Cowgar <[email protected]>: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ramon_Rib=F3?= <[email protected]> wrote: >> > that -M filename is also a useful choice. Regarding the bloat factor: the >> > diff for -M is only a few lines of real code. i've pasted it below, but >> >> In my opinion, the decision should not be based on the added >> complexity to the code (we programmers can deal with complexity, can't >> we?), but with the added complexity for the final user. One more >> option to read in the help, one more option to remember... >> > > and a whole lot of functionality. To me we shouldn't decide based on code > complexity nor the number of options available but the necessity. -M is > necessary for many tools to integrate with fossil and we do want more tools > to integrate because it means more users. More users = better testing. Better > testing = less problems for you and I. Another side effect is a larger number > of users = a few more devs from that user bank, which starts the cycle all > over again. > > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
