> If there is an option that a user has no interest in using, why would
> the user attempt to remember what it was?

I recently had to read the cvs manual to find an option of one
subcommand. I assure you that it was not a pleasant task to surf
between the thousands of stupid options that cvs has gained with the
years.

On the other side, it is a real pleasure to do "fossil help ..." and
discover that the description of the subcommand takes less than 10
lines.

> I personally like -M / --message-file and would value any features that
> make fossil easier to integrate

I have recently integrated fossil inside a GUI tool in RamDebugger (is
it the first integration?), and have not missed at all the
"-message-file" option. Why? It is fairly easy from an external tool
to massage the log message to fit in the "-m" option.

RR

2009/12/10 Daniel Clark <[email protected]>:
> Ramon Ribó wrote:
>>> that -M filename is also a useful choice. Regarding the bloat factor: the
>>> diff for -M is only a few lines of real code. i've pasted it below, but
>>
>> In my opinion, the decision should not be based on the added
>> complexity to the code (we programmers can deal with complexity, can't
>> we?), but with the added complexity for the final user. One more
>> option to read in the help, one more option to remember...
>
> If there is an option that a user has no interest in using, why would
> the user attempt to remember what it was?
>
> I personally like -M / --message-file and would value any features that
> make fossil easier to integrate, as I'll probably be writing fossil
> support for one of the python (d)vcs abstraction layers soon.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Daniel JB Clark   | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation
> pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to