Ramon Ribó wrote: >> that -M filename is also a useful choice. Regarding the bloat factor: the >> diff for -M is only a few lines of real code. i've pasted it below, but > > In my opinion, the decision should not be based on the added > complexity to the code (we programmers can deal with complexity, can't > we?), but with the added complexity for the final user. One more > option to read in the help, one more option to remember...
If there is an option that a user has no interest in using, why would the user attempt to remember what it was? I personally like -M / --message-file and would value any features that make fossil easier to integrate, as I'll probably be writing fossil support for one of the python (d)vcs abstraction layers soon. Cheers, -- Daniel JB Clark | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
