On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Jan Nijtmans <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thinking more about it, C-cards are more suitable to add comments > to Control artifacts than special T-cards. > i'm all for that, but part of my self-imposed mandate is to mimic the current behaviour (i.e. avoid breaking anything), so i've refrained from any sort of experimentation in that regard. The comment on Cancel tags was low-hanging fruit i just happened to stumble across while porting the crosslinking, and saw that it was also compatible with the v1 code in the other editor window. But i'd be all for adding a C card to all (or nearly all) control artifacts. It's important, though, that the combination of legal cards for any given artifact type always be unambiguous, so that the parser can answer the question, "what type of artifact is this?" during or after parsing (the lib code does it during, fossil(1) does it after). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
