On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Jan Nijtmans <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2013/8/15 Joe Mistachkin <[email protected]>: > > Also, I'm somewhat confused about the need for this restriction, > > especially since Stephan seems to have come up with a valid use case > > for it.... > Wouldn't it be more logical to allow C-cards in Control artifacts > as well, for display in the timeline? Then a comment can be > given to ALL Control artifacts in the timeline, not only the ones > using [+-]close. I think that would be a more logical extension > than allowing cancelling T-cards with a value. > That might not be a bad addition, but IMO placing a constraint of no value on a T card seems artificially limiting at this point, esp. since (A) the spec implies it's okay and (B) it currently works but the value is ignored (so there's no backwards compatibility issue there). i saw that you already closed the branch, so it seems to be resolved, but i'm _very_ interested in not causing any sort of incompatibility, so i very much appreciate discussions on this level of detail. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
