On 10/10/2016 08:12 AM, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 09:31 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12673229
> 
> These are probably significant decision points for a lot of people:
> 
> "My intent is to continue personally supporting and maintaining Fossil
> for at least three more decades."
> 
> https://youtu.be/Jib2AmRb_rk?t=4m33s

Along the same lines, it might be awesome if there were a dhr@
implementation of HDF5[1] using the same engineering methods, quality
standards, and long-term maintenance guarantees as SQLite.

Taking that idea further, if there were a data repository management
system, like Fossil, but with the goals (or additional goals) of
managing HDF5 based instrumentation data rather than (or addition to)
text file revision history, that could be a big deal within the
scientific communities.

[1]: https://www.hdfgroup.org/hdf5/
Though an open standard, there is only a single implementation of HDF5
(and it is less than inspiring).
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to