On 10/10/2016 08:12 AM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 10/09/2016 09:31 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12673229 > > These are probably significant decision points for a lot of people: > > "My intent is to continue personally supporting and maintaining Fossil > for at least three more decades." > > https://youtu.be/Jib2AmRb_rk?t=4m33s
Along the same lines, it might be awesome if there were a dhr@ implementation of HDF5[1] using the same engineering methods, quality standards, and long-term maintenance guarantees as SQLite. Taking that idea further, if there were a data repository management system, like Fossil, but with the goals (or additional goals) of managing HDF5 based instrumentation data rather than (or addition to) text file revision history, that could be a big deal within the scientific communities. [1]: https://www.hdfgroup.org/hdf5/ Though an open standard, there is only a single implementation of HDF5 (and it is less than inspiring). _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users