Mike,

You are correct. That was my post. The point I was making was that if you 
subscribe for 2 years (no SW maintenance fees required) you are bound to get 
another release.

Regardless of how much someone may "just not like" FrameMaker 12, it would be 
difficult to accept this as a minor release. Product development has speeded up 
addition of time-saving features over what we experienced 7-9 years ago.



Maxwell Hoffmann |  Product  Evangelist  |  Adobe  |  p. 503.336.5952  |  c. 
503.805.3719  |  [email protected] 
http://twitter.com/maxwellhoffmannhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/maxwellhoffmann  blogs.adobe.com/techcomm
Upcoming webinars http://adobe.ly/Pbz6xI    Recorded webinars: 
http://adobe.ly/Pbdp0J


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Wickham
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing policies

I don't have the original message handy, but I think the original poster was 
saying that at least the last three FrameMaker releases have been on an 
18-month cycle. We get a new version of FM every year and a half. 
This was previously the case with Creative Suite software, too.

Mike Wickham

On 1/24/2014 10:54 AM, Roger Shuttleworth wrote:
> "Three releases of FrameMaker in 18 months" - really? I must have 
> missed two of them.

_______________________________________________


You are currently subscribed to framers as [email protected].

Send list messages to [email protected].

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[email protected]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

Reply via email to