I think we should be happy that the new version has some significant improvements and shows that Frame is NOT a dead or dying product, instead of complaining about the lateness of the new features.
Regards, Shmuel Wolfson Alison Carrico wrote: > In my business (document/software translation/localization), the Unicode > support alone is worth the price of admission several times over. I was > as giddy as a schoolgirl when I printed a Russian doc to PDF & all the > bookmarks came out perfectly. I've been using TimeSavers in 7.1 and, > while it is a huge help, there are characters in several languages that > do not convert correctly, requiring tedious copy/pasting to correct. > I'm working with the trial version until Purchasing gets the upgrade > ordered, and we'll recommend upgrading to several of our clients. > > BUT... it really is disappointing to see relatively few real > innovations. IMO, a lot of the new features warrant only an "It's about > time", not "Wow, cool!" Makes me wonder what the Frame engineers at > Adobe have been doing for the umpteen years between 7.2 & this version. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: > framers-bounces+acarrico=adamsglobalization.com at lists.frameusers.com > [mailto:framers-bounces+acarrico=adamsglobalization.com at lists.frameusers > .com] On Behalf Of Sarah O'Keefe > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:00 PM > To: framers at frameusers.com > Subject: first impressions of FrameMaker 8 > > I've posted an overview of FrameMaker 8 with my impressions here: > > http://www.scriptorium.com/palimpsest/2007/08/framemaker-8-first-impress > ions.html > > Please feel free to comment on the blog or in this forum. The review > itself is too long to post to the list in its entirety (and it has > screen shots and PDF links). > > Regards, > > Sarah O'Keefe >