Its as valid as any officer of a company doing something for worse reasons. His justification may not be exemplary, however it is not malfeasance. Since it is somewhere around the middle ground I see no reason to take him to task for it.
Scott At 5:38 AM -0800 3/1/07, John Posada wrote: > > Considering how most companies spend their money on >> the latest fad, or hot idea that the V.P. in charge >> suddenly is convinced is the way to go (usually without >> much real investigation), I don't see what the problem is. > >and this is a legitimate and credible justification? > >> easier for us, I don't really see that there is a rush to real >> cost-effectiveness. Why not look around for alternatives? > >Because it's the right way to do it and I like to look at my face in >the miror. > >John Posada >Senior Technical Writer > >"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've >never actually known what the question is."
