I should've known that. Thanks for an informative summary! --- Dov Isaacs <isaacs at adobe.com> wrote:
> Although MacOS X has UNIX underpinnings, the > difficult > stuff relating to user interfaces, font access, > output, > etc. is all exclusive to MacOS X and has no real > similarity > to Solaris, the other platform on which FrameMaker > is still > supported (other than Windows). And of course, you > have > differences in processor instruction sets (Sun's > processors > versus Gx or Mactel). > > - Dov > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Borokowski > > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:39 AM > > To: Free Framers List; > framers at lists.frameusers.com > > Subject: Re: Frame's future @ Mac/UNIX > > > > It is possible I'm wholly clueless here. Although > > rare, it does occur. > > > > Mac OSX is a Mach/BSD hybrid. Wouldn't that enable > you > > to use the UNIX version of FrameMaker? > > > > If not, have you considered Linux? > > > > --- Paul Findon <pfindon at infopage.net> wrote: > > > One of our frustrations is > > > that there is no > > > FrameMaker alternative on the Mac. > http://www.dionysius.com code | tech | docs | leadership ____________________________________________________________________________________ Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
