On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
here's a first summary of all votes cast so far by the framework team on selection particular plips for inclusion into plone 3.1:
all but one of the remaining votes have been casted in the meantime, so it's time for an update:
#184: +5 (5 votes)
#187: +2 (4 votes)
#195: +5 (5 votes)
#196: +5 (5 votes)
#199: -5 (5 votes)
#200: +5 (5 votes)
#201: +4 (5 votes incl 1 abstained)
#202: +5 (5 votes)
#203: +5 (5 votes)
#204: +5 (5 votes)
#205: +5 (5 votes)
#207: +5 (5 votes)
#208: +5 (5 votes)
#209: +5 (5 votes)
#210: +5 (5 votes)
#211: +5 (5 votes)
#212: +4 (5 votes incl 1 abstained)
#213: +5 (5 votes)
#214: -5 (5 votes)
#215: +5 (5 votes)
#216: +5 (5 votes)
#217: +5 (5 votes)
#218: +5 (5 votes)
#219: +1 (5 votes)
#220: +5 (5 votes)
#221: +0 (5 votes)
the only missing vote now is Raphael's on #187, but i suppose we can
go without it, since it cannot make a difference on the outcome
anymore. besides, waiting for it could take a while, since Raphael
said it's possible he will be offline for a while.
the official announcement about which plips got accepted or rejected will follow in a few minutes. and again, the updated compilation of all votes has been attached for reference.
cheers, andi
#184: Include more/improved portlets **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:10 +1, with the qualifier that I'd like the PLIP to be locked down to the 3 portlets listed there now, and that, as Martin noted, the static portlet will use the kupu formlib widget from PLIP 200. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:03 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 14, 2007 - 21:28 +1 seconding martijn's limit to the three portlets and #220 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 08:07 +1 under the restrictions pointed out above. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:11 +1 #187: Working Out-of-the-box WebDAV **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 22:47 +1 (low hanging fruit as the work is already done) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 22, 2007 - 10:01 -1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001623.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 22, 2007 - 15:07 +1 (if the implementation should prove too invasive or too slow we can always still bump this to 3.2 but i don't see any reason to reject this plip per se for 3.1) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:13 +1 #195: Support product dependencies **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:19 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:45 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-November/001406.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:29 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 22, 2007 - 15:05 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:13 +1 #196: GroupUserFolder removing **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:19 +1 on cleaning up and fixing broken links, but -1 on replacing existing tools (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001507.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:01 I second this. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 08:15 +1 on cleaning up the UI and making it use the proper API but -1 on tool removal/change. I would consider that OK for Plone 4.0 but not for 3.1. Introducing deprecation warnings, however, could be considered OK. BTW: I'm somewhat confused here myself because as pointed out in the PLIP the GroupUserFolder isn't usable since a while anyway but I simply don't know whether it could be considered safe for removal is I cannot judge whether anything still might bepend on it (most notably 3rd-party add-ons which we have promised not to break in this release). **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:04 Another +1 on the UI cleanups and -1 on the risky tool removals. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:14 +1 on UI cleanups #199: Integration of ARFilePreview in Plone core (preview of office and other binary files) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:20 -1 this seems like a lot of code for a feature that not everybody will be using. it's a great plip, but i'm against including this feature into plone core. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 13:42 -1 like Tom I don't see the need for this in the core. This is a perfect fit for an add-on IMHO. **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:21 -1 from me as well, it'd be a great add-on but it feels to 'heavy' in the way of storing the preview results in the ZODB (blobs or otherwise). This is something an integrator may add to a plone site if the customer requests it, not something that should be part of the default package. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 22, 2007 - 10:02 -1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001624.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:45 -1 #200: Kupu formlib widget **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:10 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:00 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:23 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:02 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:36 +1 #201: Improve the UberSelectionWidget UI **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:13 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:01 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** ah well... **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:14 i suppose i should really make this an "abstained", since i've already contributed somewhat here... **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:03 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 13:43 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:37 +1 #202: Support inline validation and editing for formlib forms **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:17 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:01 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:25 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:04 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:38 +1 #203: Manage portlet assignments with GenericSetup **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:16 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:01 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:26 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:05 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:42 +1 #204: Manage content rules using GenericSetup **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:16 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:01 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001484.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:27 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:06 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:43 +1 #205: Flexibility Associating Portlet Types and Portlet Managers **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 14:00 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 14:30 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001540.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:41 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:07 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:43 +1 #207: Allow Custom Portlet Managers **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 14:00 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 14:30 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001540.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:22 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:08 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:45 +1 #208: Adapter-Based Local Role Lookup **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 16:45 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001547.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 17:07 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:36 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:22 +1 yes, please! **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:46 +1 #209: Add buildout to Unified Installer **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:31 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 01:03 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001520.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:20 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:16 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 17:46 +1 #210: Improve UI support for objects on multiple workflows **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:06 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001496.html and http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001515.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:31 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:22 +1 **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:09 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 15:53 +1 #211: Enable dashboard to be locked down **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:07 tentative +1 with respect to the migration and security issues mentioned in http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001497.html **** +1 **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 14, 2007 - 21:21 seconding andi's comments **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:20 same here (see above) **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:12 +1 with same comments. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 15:56 +1 #212: Use jQuery Javascript Library **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:25 Abstained **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:11 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001499.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:14 +1 (!) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 13:50 +1 (I'm no expert here by no means but I'm confident Martijn and Florian know that they are doing here. AFAICT this is also handled in close collaboration with the KSS crowd so that's good) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 15:58 +1 but only if this cannot be covered by KSS. #213: Prepare for better Syndication **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 13, 2007 - 22:41 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:12 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001498.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:18 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:23 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 15:59 +1 #214: Merge of CMFPlacefulWorkflow into CMFPlone/WorkflowTool **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 13, 2007 - 23:17 tentative -1 awaiting further information (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001508.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:17 -1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 13:52 -1 given the current state of discussion. Might be good for consideration in 4.0 though. **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:08 -1 due to Alec's better alternative **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 15:59 -1 #215: Include new KSS versions **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 11:32 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001528.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 12:37 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:13 +1 and pointing out that jQuery now uses CSS selectors throughout, so in the light of #212 i would urge to use jQuery here, as well instead of base2. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 20, 2007 - 13:54 +1 (and reinforcing Tom's comment) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:01 +1 #216: Template overrides **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 15:56 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001544.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 13:16 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:11 +1 under provision of using z3c.jbot as inspiration and putting the actual code into plone core, as discussed on the list. great plip, btw! **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:13 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:02 +1 #217: Use Adaptation for Workflow Assignment **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 16:45 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001547.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 17:08 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:30 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 20, 2007 - 13:26 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:05 +1 Does this also mean that you theoretically could have a setting on an object which workflows it uses? That would be nice (with the proper UI of course ;-)) #218: Increase Restrictions, and Ability to Change, Addable Portlet Types by Interface **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:39 +1 **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:15 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 21, 2007 - 23:53 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001617.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 22, 2007 - 15:08 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:06 +1 #219: New site search implementation **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 21, 2007 - 16:27 -1 because of the risk of breaking customizations as discussed on the framework team list **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 17:14 -1 because we can't make this optional. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 22, 2007 - 09:57 +1 provided the new result listing can be made optional (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001622.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 22, 2007 - 15:20 +1 but the grouping behaviour should be made optional, configurable via the search control panel (i'm fine with setting the default to 'grouping') **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:07 +1 This is a necessary improvement imo. #220: Improve browser layer support **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 14, 2007 - 21:27 +1 **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 14, 2007 - 21:29 +1 (!) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 14, 2007 - 22:26 +1 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001564.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 08:50 +1 from Raphael **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:09 +1 #221: Use adaption for workflow history and status **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Raphael Ritz at December 17, 2007 - 12:45 +1 (I don't mind the delay in this case as I consider it an enhancement of Alec's PLIP #217 which I'm also in favor of rather then something new) **** Framework vote **** Posted by Martijn Pieters at December 21, 2007 - 22:51 -1 as I prefer this going straight into CMF; there is no pressing need to do this now. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Andreas Zeidler at December 22, 2007 - 10:00 ±0 (see http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2007-December/001625.html) **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Tom Lazar at December 22, 2007 - 15:10 abstained. i *think* this should probably go into CMFWorkflow but i'm not really knowledgeable enough on the matter to reach an informed decision. **** Framework team vote **** Posted by Danny Bloemendaal at December 22, 2007 - 16:10 +/-
-- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.0.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
