On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote: imho, yes. the fact that two additional packages are introduced by the PLIP should have been pointed out, along with additional review notes about them, or at least a note whether they have been reviewed or not...It should have been pretty obvious, the review buildout had a 'parts/review' part with the changed or new products inside it, and only them.
yes, i agree, and even more so with this piece of information. what i'm saying is that i would have liked tom and/or raphael to point this out, especially since newly introduced packages kinda raised the chances of having the PLIP conflict with the release goal of being non- invasive.
cheers, andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.0.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
