On 5/26/10 7:25 PM, Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu > <mailto:ha...@hannosch.eu>> wrote: > > Why wouldn't we want to migrate content by default? If we don't do it > by default, only a few will figure out how to do it and people loose > the major advantage that blobs give them. > > I haven't been involved in the PLIP discussions around this as much, > but I thought this was a clear case of something that just wasn't done > yet. If you have a specialized need, you can opt-out of this upgrade > step by using the portal_setup upgrades screen and omitting this one > step. But the default should be to migrate people. > > > +1. Also, getting this change in as early as possible will give us > more time to figure out whether there are migration issues. > > Having some data stored one way, and some data stored another (for the > same type of content) just seems like it'll cause problems later. > > Is it a lot of work to enable? I assume the difficult part already > exists, since we can manually trigger the migration? If I recall, the main risks are that the migration may take a long time, and that the admin may not have properly configured blob-storage in their buildout. The migration itself is pretty well-tested, at least under Plone 3 -- Groundwire has migrated dozens of sites to use blobs. There may be some other concern I am forgetting? David
-- David Glick Web Developer Groundwire 206.286.1235x32 davidgl...@groundwire.org http://groundwire.org Sign up for Groundwire News! Tips, tools and news delivered directly to your inbox. http://groundwire.org/news-signup
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
