Dear Karl Thank you mail. I follow your instruction. If my bolex works fine, it will be OK. What do you mean “ bolex rewind/2x exposure Q” quoting from your last mail? I do appreciate your reply.
Takahiko iimura<film/video/multimedia artist> 2021/06/26 2:23、Karl Reinsalu <[email protected]> のメール： > Get your numbers all at 0/0/0 (Feet, Frames, 100's). > Take off your lens. > Flip back the prism. > Mark this frame with a sharpie around the edges and a BIG OL X. > Do your thing from start to finish of the roll. > Rewind in camera until you BELOW THE 0 MARK BY A FEW FRAMES. > Remove lens and advance film 1x frame at a time until you see your mark, aka: > EXACT 0. > > Enjoy or something similar! > > Karl. > LIFT TECH. > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:07 PM Anna Kipervaser <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hey Jimmy, > > Reminding that much film is always a bitch and can cause problems. You could, > instead, shoot the whole roll and then rewind it on rewinds in the dark, > reload and shoot the whole roll! > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 1:01 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. bolex rewind/2x exposure Q (jimmyschaus1) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: jimmyschaus1 <[email protected]> > To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:07:58 +0200 > Subject: [Frameworks] bolex rewind/2x exposure Q > Hi all, > > I'm shooting some 16 with a Bolex this weekend, and plan to do multiple > exposures over the entire roll. > > For those of you with experience doing this, what's a good point on the > footage counter to do the rewind, to take advantage of using most of the roll > while still keeping it engaged in the camera and not accidentally finishing > it? I was thinking 95? 97? > > thanks, > Jimmy > -- > Frameworks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org > -- > Frameworks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org > > > -- > -- > Karl Reinsalu > e.mail: [email protected] > -- > Frameworks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
-- Frameworks mailing list [email protected] https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
