Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:20:51 -0800, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > If we had taken -current to 500, we could go to 501, 502, etc as
> > required to stop killing our developers, and prior to entering 5.0-BETA we
> > go back to the next sequentially available major number (be it 5, or 6
> > if RELENG_4 bumps again).
> Shared library version numbers going backwards is *evil*. Not quite
> as evil as it used to be under a.out, but still evil. Please don't go
There is no concept of "forward" or "backward" as far as the toolchain and
runtime support goes. There is only "filename exists" or "file not found".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message