Matt Dillon wrote: > If directories are spread all over the disk, caching > is non-optimal. But if they are relatively close to each other then > both our VM cache (if vfs.vmiodirenable is set to 1) and the hard > drive's internal cache become extremely effective. I notice that this option is off by default. Can you give a general idea of when it should be enabled, when it should be disabled, and what bad things might result with it on? Thanks, Doug -- Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant simply because they are their opinions. Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost Brian Somers
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost Brian Somers
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance b... Zhihui Zhang
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performan... Brian Somers
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performan... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance b... Alex Zepeda
- Re[2]: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performanc... David Xu
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Filesystem gets a huge pe... Bruce A. Mah
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Filesystem gets a huge pe... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance b... Doug Barton
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performan... Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge perf... Peter Wemm
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performan... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge perf... Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Matt Dillon
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Doug Barton
- Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge ... Alfred Perlstein